As if sentiment around Smid-cap biotechs wasn’t bad enough, Q1 provided a painful reminder of the high failure rate in biotech. The slew of disappointing results at ASH in December 2015 (which I discussed here) was followed by numerous clinical failures and regulatory setbacks. Most notable blowups came from Celldex (CLDX), Incyte (INCY), Alkermes (ALKS), Oncomed (OMED), Chimerix (CMRX), Atara (ATRA), PTC (PTCT) and Portola (PTLA). Continue reading
The past six months have been quite frustrating for Exelixis (EXEL) investors (myself included). The company had a string of positive announcements for cabozantinib (cabo) and Roche-partnered cobimetinib (Cotellic) including positive overall survival readouts for both drugs. Since the July announcement on the METEOR study in renal cancer, the stock is up only 16% despite having a wholly owned drug with a blockbuster potential, imminent approval and significant label expansion potential. Continue reading
After 5 years of a raging bull market, more than 140 IPOs and tens of billions in proceeds, there is a debate on whether the violent selloff in biotech stocks is a hiccup or the beginning of a real correction. I have no idea where the sector is heading in the coming weeks but it seems like the overall sobering experience coupled with this month’s selloff changed Wall Street’s perception around biotech. Investors are finally realizing drug development is fraught with uncertainty and that biotech is an attractive but not infallible segment, which is why I expect the correction to continue in 2016. Continue reading
Although hematology represents a small portion of human diseases, its weight in the biotech equity markets is disproportionally high. Bluebird (BLUE), Agios (AGIO), Juno (JUNO), Kite (KITE), Cellectis (CLLS), Pharmacyclics (PCYC), Incyte (INCY), Genmab (GEN.CO), Seattle Genetics (SGEN) and Acceleron (XLRN) all derive the majority of their valuations from hematology drugs. This is also the case for larger companies such as Amgen (AMGN), Celgene (CELG) and Alexion (ALXN). Continue reading
Clovis (CLVS) lost 75% of its market cap last week after disclosing a disappointingly low response rate for rociletinib in T790M+ NSCLC patients. Updated response rates were 28%-34%, dramatically lower than the 54-60% response rate reported at ASCO 2015. According to the company, the dramatic difference stems from analyzing the same data set based on more stringent criteria (confirmed response rate). Continue reading
Esperion (ESPR) has been the target of a lot of criticism lately, demonstrated by the collapse from $115 to $24 in just 5 months. Investors became skeptical about Esperion’s ability to get FDA approval without cardiovascular outcomes data, which may push approval by 2-3 years and decrease probability of success. Even if the drug obtains FDA approval, many are worried about a narrow label that will limit initial commercial opportunity. Continue reading
The ECC/ESMO meeting, the European equivalent of ASCO, will take place next weekend. Historically, this event has received limited investor attention (since most of the important late stage stuff is reserved for ASCO) but in recent years its importance is growing as more practice-changing data are presented. As a proof of this trend, this year’s meeting will include the two most important breakthroughs in renal cancer in almost a decade. Continue reading
The biotech sector is having a brutal summer, with major indices (IBB, FBT, XBI) down 15-20% from their July highs. Even after this decline, valuations for most biotech stocks are still rich and need to come down by an additional ~25% in order to become reasonably priced. As my working hypothesis includes a correction (with significant fluctuations) going into 2016, I still plan to have a significant cash position and complement it with leveraged short bio ETFs. Continue reading
Post-surgical pain is not the first indication people think about in the context of innovative drugs. From an investor standpoint, pain in the acute care setting is perceived as a temporary, symptomatic hospital-related issue with a poor value proposition. Some may even claim the unmet need is limited given available treatments (especially opioids). This is demonstrated by Trevena’s (TRVN) modest market cap ($264M) despite a positive clinical signal, an ongoing phase 2b and a potential FDA approval within three years. Continue reading
The biotech sector is currently in the most successful period in its history based on valuation metrics, amount of money raised and number of IPOs. The perception around the current situation ranges from very bearish (it’s a bubble) to very bullish (there’s enough innovation to fuel future growth).
Before providing my take (which is very subjective and is as good as anybody else’s for that matter), there are two things most investors agree on:
1 – The biopharma industry enjoyed a massive wave of innovation in the form of revolutionary drugs that truly make a difference for patients. These include PD-1 antibodies, curative HCV drugs and PCSK9 antibodies just to name a few. Fundamentally, our understanding around diseases and our abilities to modulate them has never been better, which should dramatically increase success rates in the long run.
2 – The biotech sector has had a huge run in the past ~3 years. Since the beginning of 2012, the primary biotech indices on NASDAQ and NYSE are up 250%-260%. This means that in 3.5 years, the biotech industry (which was already quite established at the time) saw its valuation more than triple. Continue reading